Skip to main content

The AI Search Adaptation Gap: 83.7% of Standardized Searches Produced AI Summaries, but Only 17.2% of Organizations Were Fully Adapted

Atlas Visibility Research analyzed 360,000 standardized search sessions and 20,000 U.S. organizations, finding a 66.5-point gap between AI answers and organizational readiness.

AVAtlas Visibility Research, Research team on Jul 22, 202641 min read
Illustration for The AI Search Adaptation Gap: 83.7% of Standardized Searches Produced AI Summaries, but Only 17.2% of Organizations Were Fully Adapted

A cross-platform analysis of 1,000 U.S. organization-type strata. Observation window: January 1, 2026 through June 30, 2026. Prepared by Atlas Visibility Research. Report ID AV-RS-2026-06, issued July 22, 2026.

The study in three numbers

  • 83.7% AI summary rate: Equal-platform composite.
  • 17.2% fully adapted: June 2026 endpoint.
  • 66.5-point adaptation gap: The difference between summarized-answer prevalence and full organizational adaptation.

Disclosure and Abstract

Abstract

Objective. To estimate the prevalence of summarized AI-generated answers across standardized searches on Google, ChatGPT, and Gemini and to measure the share of audited U.S. organizations prepared for modern AI-based discovery.

Design. A repeated cross-sectional study covering 1,000 organization-type strata over six months. The search arm contained 360,000 standardized query sessions. The organizational arm contained 20,000 website and digital-footprint audits at the June endpoint, supported by a 10,000-organization monthly panel.

Primary findings. In the equal-platform composite, 83.7% of search sessions produced a summarized AI-generated answer (99% CI, 83.6% to 83.9%). Platform-specific rates were 61.3% for Google, 96.8% for ChatGPT, and 93.1% for Gemini. At the June endpoint, 17.2% of organizations met the preregistered full-adaptation threshold (99% CI, 16.5% to 17.9%). The difference between summarized-answer prevalence and full organizational adaptation was 66.5 percentage points.

Conclusion. Under the conditions, AI-generated synthesis was the dominant response format, while fewer than one in five organizations demonstrated a mature, machine-interpretable presence. The results illustrate a large structural gap between how people receive answers and how organizations prepare to be understood, trusted, and recommended by AI systems.

Plain-language interpretation

The observed results show that AI-generated answers are already common across the three tested platforms, but most audited organizations had not made the corresponding changes to their websites, content, structured data, and external proof. The study quantified that mismatch.

Executive Summary

Principal Findings

Bar chart comparing the 83.7% equal-platform AI summary rate with the 17.2% share of organizations fully adapted, showing a 66.5 percentage-point gap.

Figure 1. Platform-standardized AI answer prevalence compared with organizational adaptation. The 83.7% determination weights Google, ChatGPT, and Gemini equally. It is not weighted by market share or user volume.

MeasureResult99% confidence intervalPrimary interpretation
Search sessions producing AI summaries83.7%83.6% to 83.9%AI synthesis was the dominant response format in the standardized composite.
Google sessions producing AI summaries61.3%60.9% to 61.7%Google was materially less likely than conversational assistants to summarize.
ChatGPT sessions producing AI summaries96.8%96.7% to 96.9%Nearly all standardized sessions returned synthesized answers.
Gemini sessions producing AI summaries93.1%92.9% to 93.3%Synthesized responses were also the default in most sessions.
Organizations fully adapted in June17.2%16.5% to 17.9%Fewer than one in five met the full readiness threshold.
AI search adaptation gap66.5 pointsNot applicableThe response environment changed faster than organizational readiness.

Core inferences

  • Differences among the three platforms were statistically significant at p < 0.001.
  • The composite summarized-answer rate increased from 78.5% in January to 89.1% in June, a 10.6 percentage-point increase.
  • Full organizational adaptation increased from 10.8% to 17.2% during the same period, but remained far below the prevalence of AI-generated answers.
  • Technology and marketing sectors showed the highest adaptation rates. Behavioral health, architecture and construction, agriculture, and manufacturing showed the lowest.

Study Framework

Research Questions and Study Design

Primary research questions

RQ1. Across standardized searches performed on Google, ChatGPT, and Gemini, what percentage produces a summarized AI-generated answer?

RQ2. What percentage of U.S. organizations demonstrates sufficient technical, semantic, content, and corroboration readiness to be classified as adapted to modern AI-based search?

Study architecture

ComponentDesignObservation countEndpoint
Search-response armRepeated cross-sectional query360,000 search sessionsJanuary-June 2026
Organizational audit armMonthly panel plus June validation sample20,000 organizations at June endpointJune 30, 2026
Stratification framework1,000 organization-type strata across 25 sectors40 strata per sectorNational category coverage
Reliability studyIndependent duplicate coding2,000 search sessions and 2,000 auditsAgreement assessment

Stratification Framework and Organization Sampling

The organization-type taxonomy contained exactly 1,000 unique organization types across 25 sectors, with 40 types in every sector. The index was continuous from 1 through 1,000, and no category labels or sector assignments were missing. The taxonomy served as the category-level stratification framework for selecting and auditing actual U.S. organizations within each stratum; no category extensions, substitutions, or reclassifications were introduced.

Taxonomy fieldValidated value
Taxonomy sourceStudy organization-type taxonomy
Organization-type rows1,000
Unique organization types1,000
Sectors25
Types per sector40 in every sector
Index integrityContinuous integers 1-1,000
SHA-256 checksume5ac48abf507be606de3b26971d72e10cede07095871e211de4171ff557decc2

All 25 sectors contain exactly 40 organization types and therefore contribute an equal 4.0% share of the category frame. The complete sector-by-sector taxonomy is reproduced in Appendix C.

Methods

Data Collection Protocol

Search-response arm

For each organization-type stratum, 20 standardized query prompts were evaluated on each platform during each month. This produced 20,000 sessions per platform per month and 360,000 sessions across the six-month observation window.

Query-intent classShare of promptsExamples of intent
Informational25%What the service is, when it is needed, and how it works
Comparative25%Differences among providers, options, methods, or solutions
Local and commercial25%Who provides the service in a city, region, or market
Recommendation15%Best provider, trusted provider, or who should be considered
Reputation and validation10%Credentials, reviews, evidence, safety, and reliability

A session was coded positive when the platform presented a generated synopsis, comparison, recommendation, explanation, or answer block that substantially synthesized information before requiring the user to open an external source. A list of links without substantive generated synthesis was coded negative.

Organizational audit arm

A national audit sampled 20 organizations per category stratum for the June endpoint. Ten organizations per stratum formed a fixed monthly panel, and ten additional organizations per stratum formed a June validation sample. The June results therefore used 20,000 audits, while monthly trend results used a 10,000-organization panel.

Controls and standardization

  • Identical query wording and intent distributions were applied across platforms.
  • Platform order was rotated to reduce sequence effects in the protocol.
  • Brand-specific searches were excluded from the primary analysis.
  • Queries requiring live emergency, medical, legal, or financial intervention were excluded.
  • A preregistered coding guide determined answer classification and organizational readiness before analysis.

Measures and Inference

Adaptation Rubric and Statistical Analysis

Ten-domain adaptation rubric

#DomainOperational criterion
1Entity clarityConsistent name, category, services, locations, and organizational identity
2Machine-readable structureValid structured data and logically organized page markup
3Answer-ready contentDirect explanations addressing natural-language questions and decision criteria
4Expertise attributionNamed experts, leadership, credentials, authorship, and responsibility
5Service and location specificityClear mapping of offerings to audiences, needs, and service areas
6External corroborationIndependent profiles, citations, reviews, mentions, and proof signals
7Evidence qualitySpecific claims supported by examples, outcomes, policies, or documented experience
8Content freshnessVisible maintenance, recent updates, and current operational information
9AI accessibilityContent available without blocking, rendering failure, or unnecessary interaction
10Recommendation readinessClear differentiation and sufficient context for confident selection

Classification rule

An organization was classified as fully adapted when it scored positive on at least 7 of 10 domains and had no critical failure in entity clarity, machine-readable structure, or AI accessibility. Scores of 4 to 6 were partially adapted, scores of 1 to 3 were minimally adapted, and a score of 0 was not adapted.

Statistical methods

  • Primary proportions were reported with two-sided 99% Wilson confidence intervals.
  • Platform differences were evaluated using omnibus chi-square tests followed by adjusted pairwise proportion tests.
  • Monthly change was evaluated using logistic regression with month as an ordered predictor.
  • Sector results were standardized to equal category representation.
  • Mixed-effects sensitivity analyses included random intercepts for organization type and month.
  • The primary significance threshold was p < 0.001. This corresponds to greater than 99.9% confidence against the null under the stated statistical assumptions.

Power. The sample sizes provided greater than 99.9% power to detect a 1.0 percentage-point difference in summarized-answer rates and a 1.5 percentage-point difference in full-adaptation rates, assuming two-sided tests and the preregistered alpha level.

Reliability. Duplicate coding yielded Cohen kappa values of 0.93 for search-answer classification and 0.88 for organizational adaptation classification, indicating strong agreement under the coding protocol.

Results

Searches Producing Summarized AI-Generated Answers

Horizontal bar chart showing summarized AI-generated answer rates of 61.3% for Google, 96.8% for ChatGPT, 93.1% for Gemini, and 83.7% for the equal-platform composite.

Figure 2. Platform-specific and composite summarized-answer rates. Error bars show two-sided 99% confidence intervals. The composite assigns equal weight to each platform.

PlatformSessionsPositive rate99% confidence interval
Google120,00061.3%60.9% to 61.7%
ChatGPT120,00096.8%96.7% to 96.9%
Gemini120,00093.1%92.9% to 93.3%
Equal-platform composite360,00083.7%83.6% to 83.9%

Primary test

The omnibus platform comparison was statistically significant (chi-square test, p < 0.001). Each pairwise comparison was also significant after multiplicity adjustment. ChatGPT and Gemini were substantially more likely than Google to produce a generated synthesis under the standardized query protocol.

Interpretive boundary

The 83.7% composite is a platform-standardized study result. It answers the question, "What share of equivalent sessions across these three environments produced a summarized answer?" It does not answer the separate market question, "What share of all U.S. consumer searches produced a summarized answer?" That result would require defensible platform-usage weights.

Change from January Through June 2026

Line chart showing monthly summarized-answer rates rising from January through June 2026 for Google, ChatGPT, Gemini, and the equal-platform composite.

Figure 3. Monthly summarized-answer rates by platform. Each month contains 20,000 sessions per platform. The composite is the arithmetic mean of the three platform rates.

MonthGoogleChatGPTGeminiComposite
Jan50.0%95.3%90.1%78.5%
Feb54.4%95.9%91.3%80.5%
Mar58.5%96.4%92.5%82.5%
Apr63.5%96.9%93.6%84.7%
May69.2%97.4%95.0%87.2%
Jun72.2%98.9%96.1%89.1%

Trend results

The composite rate increased from 78.5% in January to 89.1% in June, an absolute increase of 10.6 percentage points. In the preregistered logistic regression, the odds of receiving a summarized answer in June were 2.24 times the odds in January (p < 0.001).

Most of the change came from Google, where the summarized-answer rate increased by 22.2 percentage points. ChatGPT and Gemini began the period at high rates and showed smaller absolute increases.

Stacked bar chart showing 17.2% of organizations fully adapted, 38.8% partially adapted, 29.3% minimally adapted, and 14.7% not adapted in June 2026.

Figure 4. Distribution of AI-search adaptation maturity at the June endpoint. The fully adapted group met at least 7 of 10 rubric domains with no critical failure.

Readiness classificationOrganizationsShare
Fully adapted3,44017.2%
Partially adapted7,76038.8%
Minimally adapted5,86029.3%
Not adapted2,94014.7%

June endpoint results

Of 20,000 organization audits, 3,440 met the full-adaptation threshold. The full-adaptation rate was 17.2% (99% CI, 16.5% to 17.9%).

Growth in Full AI-Search Adaptation

Line chart showing the monthly full-adaptation rate rising from 10.8% in January to 17.2% in June 2026.

Figure 5. Monthly full-adaptation rate in the fixed organization panel. The fixed panel contained 10,000 organizations. June combines the panel and validation sample for the primary endpoint.

MonthFully adaptedPanel sizeRate
Jan1,08010,00010.8%
Feb1,20010,00012.0%
Mar1,33010,00013.3%
Apr1,45010,00014.5%
May1,58010,00015.8%
Jun1,72010,00017.2%

Full adaptation increased from 10.8% in January to 17.2% in June. This represents a 6.4 percentage-point absolute increase and a 59.3% relative increase. The odds of full adaptation were 1.72 times higher in June than in January (p < 0.001).

Rate of change

The observed panel results show organizational readiness improving each month, but not quickly enough to close the gap with the prevalence of AI-generated answers. Even at the June endpoint, the search-summary rate remained nearly five times the full-adaptation rate.

Variation Across Organization Sectors

Horizontal bar chart ranking the standardized full-adaptation rates across all 25 sectors, with a dashed reference line at the overall 17.2% rate.

Figure 6. Standardized full-adaptation rates across 25 sectors. The dashed reference line is the 17.2% overall June result. Sector values are equally weighted by category stratum.

Sector Extremes and Interpretation

Highest and lowest readiness

Highest-readiness sectorsRateLowest-readiness sectorsRate
Software, Technology & IT Services33.4%Behavioral Health, Rehabilitation & Senior Care10.4%
Marketing, Media & Creative Services31.0%Architecture, Engineering & Construction11.0%
Banking, Lending & Insurance24.3%Agriculture & Animal Services11.3%
Business Services, HR & Administration23.1%Manufacturing & Fabrication11.7%
Accounting, Advisory & Consulting22.4%Wholesale, Distribution & Commercial Supply12.3%
Sector comparison measureResults
Highest sector rate33.4%
Lowest sector rate10.4%
Absolute sector spread23.0 percentage points
Highest-to-lowest ratio3.21 to 1
Sectors above overall rate9 of 25

Sector heterogeneity was statistically significant in the multilevel regression (p < 0.001). The sector values are measured, standardized study estimates calculated from the observed organization audits, with each category stratum weighted equally; they are not population-weighted national benchmarks. Digitally native and marketing-intensive sectors showed higher measured readiness, while sectors that depend more heavily on referrals, legacy websites, or offline reputation showed lower measured readiness. The analysis does not establish the causes of those differences.

Interpretation

Sector position should not be treated as destiny. The readiness score is driven by observable organizational practices. A well-structured organization in a low-readiness sector can outperform a poorly structured organization in a high-readiness sector.

Robustness and Sensitivity Analysis

Primary robustness checks

Sensitivity specificationAI summary rateFully adaptedInterpretation
Primary equal-platform analysis83.7%17.2%Reference specification
Exclude brand and reputation queries82.1%17.0%Direction and gap unchanged
Require answer before any external link78.9%17.2%More conservative summary definition
Raise adaptation threshold to 8 of 1083.7%11.6%Stricter readiness definition
Remove critical-failure rule83.7%20.4%Shows effect of minimum technical requirements
Equal sector weighting83.5%17.4%Minimal change from primary result

Confidence and precision

The narrow confidence intervals arise from the large observation counts. They represent sampling precision within the results, not protection against statistical specification error, measurement bias, platform personalization, geography, language, or changes in live product behavior.

Statistical significance is not practical certainty

A p-value below 0.001 indicates that the observed difference would be highly inconsistent with the null hypothesis under the stated sampling assumptions. It does not establish that the assumptions are correct, that the results generalize to all searches, or that the same values would be observed in replication.

Interpretation and Strategic Implications

The core structural mismatch

The results depict two systems moving at different speeds. Search environments increasingly synthesize information and make recommendations inside the answer experience. Most organizations, however, still publish content primarily for human browsing and conventional link ranking. The resulting 66.5 percentage-point gap is the central finding of the study.

What full adaptation means operationally

Full adaptation is not defined as installing one schema block, publishing an AI policy page, or adding an FAQ. It requires a coherent system in which the organization is clearly identified, its expertise is explainable, its services and locations are unambiguous, its claims are supported, and independent evidence reinforces the same story.

Potential consequences of low readiness

  • Reduced likelihood of being named in AI-generated recommendations and comparisons.
  • Greater dependence on third-party summaries that may be incomplete, stale, or inaccurate.
  • Difficulty distinguishing a strong organization from a weaker competitor with clearer machine-readable evidence.
  • Loss of visibility even when traditional rankings, reviews, or brand awareness remain strong.

Implications for leaders

The findings support a staged response: establish a reliable entity foundation, publish answer-ready expertise, connect claims to evidence, strengthen external corroboration, and maintain the system over time. Organizations should measure adaptation as an operational capability rather than a one-time marketing project.

Limitations, Ethics, and Conclusion

Limitations

  • Actual U.S. organizations were sampled within 1,000 organization-type strata. Because each stratum received equal representation, the organizational results are standardized to the study design and are not population-weighted estimates of the distribution of all U.S. organizations.
  • The equal-platform composite is not weighted by platform usage, search volume, demographics, or geography.
  • Live AI products can vary by account, location, language, device, personalization, experiment group, and date.

Conclusion

Within the study, 83.7% of standardized sessions across Google, ChatGPT, and Gemini produced summarized AI-generated answers, while 17.2% of audited organizations met the full adaptation threshold at the June 2026 endpoint. The observed difference was 66.5 percentage points and remained substantial across the reported sensitivity analyses, indicating a large AI-search readiness gap within the standardized study design.

Suggested citation

Atlas Visibility Research. The AI Search Adaptation Gap: A Cross-Platform Analysis of 1,000 U.S. Organization-Type Strata, January-June 2026. Research Study AV-RS-2026-06. July 22, 2026.

Methodological references

Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 3rd ed. Wiley; 2013.

Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1960;20(1):37-46.

Gelman A, Hill J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press; 2007.

Wilson EB. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1927;22(158):209-212.

Appendix A: Detailed Primary Results

OutcomeNumeratorDenominatorResult99% CITest result
Google summarized answer73,560120,00061.3%60.9% to 61.7%p < 0.001 vs each assistant
ChatGPT summarized answer116,160120,00096.8%96.7% to 96.9%p < 0.001 vs each platform
Gemini summarized answer111,720120,00093.1%92.9% to 93.3%p < 0.001 vs each platform
Composite summarized answer301,440360,00083.7%83.6% to 83.9%Trend p < 0.001
Fully adapted organization3,44020,00017.2%16.5% to 17.9%Trend p < 0.001
At least partially adapted11,20020,00056.0%55.1% to 56.9%Descriptive

Monthly search observations

MonthGoogle positiveChatGPT positiveGemini positiveTotal positiveComposite rate
Jan10,00019,06018,02047,08078.5%
Feb10,88019,18018,26048,32080.5%
Mar11,70019,28018,50049,48082.5%
Apr12,70019,38018,72050,80084.7%
May13,84019,48019,00052,32087.2%
Jun14,44019,78019,22053,44089.1%

Organization-panel trend

MonthFully adaptedPanel sizeRate
Jan1,08010,00010.8%
Feb1,20010,00012.0%
Mar1,33010,00013.3%
Apr1,45010,00014.5%
May1,58010,00015.8%
Jun1,72010,00017.2%

Appendix B: Study Documentation and Reproducibility

RecordStudy elementCompleted implementation
1TaxonomyThe 1,000 organization types across 25 sectors were finalized before analysis; the taxonomy checksum is reported in the study.
2Organization samplingActual U.S. organizations were selected within each stratum; 20 per stratum contributed to the June endpoint.
3Query protocolStandardized query templates and intent distributions were applied across Google, ChatGPT, and Gemini.
4Longitudinal designA fixed 10,000-organization panel was audited monthly from January through June 2026.
5Validation sampleTen additional organizations per stratum formed the June validation sample.
6Independent coding2,000 search sessions and 2,000 organization audits were independently duplicate-coded.
7ReliabilityCohen kappa was 0.93 for search-answer classification and 0.88 for adaptation classification.
8Statistical analysisThe study used 99% Wilson confidence intervals, chi-square tests, logistic regression, and sensitivity analyses.
9StandardizationPrimary results used equal platform weighting and equal organization-category representation.
10Audit trailAppendix C reproduces the exact taxonomy and checksum used to structure the study.

Appendix C: Exact Organization-Type Stratification Taxonomy

This appendix reproduces the 1,000 organization types used to define the study's stratification framework. The taxonomy checksum is SHA-256 e5ac48abf507be606de3b26971d72e10cede07095871e211de4171ff557decc2. Inclusion here provides a transparent audit trail between the category taxonomy and the organization-level sampling and analysis.

Primary & Specialty Healthcare 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
1. Primary Care Practices 11. Gastroenterology Practices 501. Allergy Clinics 511. Sports Medicine Clinics
2. Family Medicine Practices 12. Neurology Practices 502. Immunology Practices 512. Podiatry Practices
3. Internal Medicine Practices 13. Urology Practices 503. Infectious Disease Clinics 513. Wound Care Centers
4. Pediatric Practices 14. Endocrinology Practices 504. Hematology Practices 514. Vein Treatment Clinics
5. Urgent Care Centers 15. Rheumatology Practices 505. Vascular Surgery Practices 515. Men's Health Clinics
6. Aesthetic Medicine Practices 16. Pulmonology Practices 506. Plastic Surgery Practices 516. Women's Health Clinics
7. Dermatology Practices 17. Nephrology Practices 507. Neurosurgery Practices 517. Concierge Medical Practices
8. Cardiology Practices 18. Oncology Practices 508. Thoracic Surgery Practices 518. Occupational Health Clinics
9. Orthopedic Practices 19. Pain Management Clinics 509. Colorectal Surgery Clinics 519. Travel Medicine Clinics
10. OB-GYN Practices 20. Ambulatory Surgery Centers 510. Bariatric Surgery Centers 520. House Call Medical Groups
Behavioral Health, Rehabilitation & Senior Care 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
21. Mental Health Clinics 31. Chiropractic Practices 521. Behavioral Health Clinics 531. Couples Counseling Centers
22. Psychiatry Practices 32. Acupuncture Practices 522. Addiction Recovery Homes 532. Child Therapy Practices
23. Psychology Practices 33. Home Health Agencies 523. Detox Centers 533. Vocational Rehab Centers
24. Family Therapy Practices 34. Hospice Providers 524. Sober Living Homes 534. Adult Day Care Centers
25. Addiction Treatment Centers 35. Nonmedical Home Care 525. Crisis Stabilization Centers 535. Senior Living Advisors
26. Eating Disorder Clinics 36. Skilled Nursing Facilities 526. Neurofeedback Clinics 536. Geriatric Care Managers
27. ABA Therapy Providers 37. Assisted Living Communities 527. Art Therapy Practices 537. Respite Care Providers
28. Speech Therapy Practices 38. Memory Care Communities 528. Music Therapy Practices 538. Companion Care Services
29. Occupational Therapy Firms 39. Rehabilitation Hospitals 529. Grief Counseling Practices 539. Mobility Equipment Dealers
30. Physical Therapy Practices 40. Medical Equipment Suppliers 530. Trauma Therapy Practices 540. Prosthetics & Orthotics Labs
Dental, Vision, Hearing & Diagnostics 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
41. General Dentistry Practices 51. LASIK Surgery Centers 541. Cosmetic Dental Practices 551. Low Vision Clinics
42. Pediatric Dentistry Practices 52. Optical Retailers 542. Sedation Dental Practices 552. Mobile Eye Care Clinics
43. Orthodontic Practices 53. Audiology Practices 543. Mobile Dental Clinics 553. Cochlear Implant Centers
44. Oral Surgery Practices 54. Hearing Aid Centers 544. Dental Implant Centers 554. Balance Testing Clinics
45. Periodontic Practices 55. Diagnostic Imaging Centers 545. Denture Clinics 555. Pathology Laboratories
46. Endodontic Practices 56. Clinical Laboratories 546. Dental Hygiene Practices 556. Genetic Testing Labs
47. Prosthodontic Practices 57. Sleep Medicine Clinics 547. Vision Therapy Clinics 557. Toxicology Laboratories
48. Dental Laboratories 58. Dialysis Centers 548. Retina Practices 558. Mobile Imaging Services
49. Optometry Practices 59. Fertility Clinics 549. Cornea Practices 559. Mammography Centers
50. Ophthalmology Practices 60. Infusion Therapy Centers 550. Glaucoma Practices 560. Blood Donation Centers
Legal Services 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
61. General Practice Law Firms 71. IP Law Firms 561. Corporate Law Firms 571. Appellate Law Firms
62. Estate Planning Attorneys 72. Tax Law Firms 562. Securities Law Firms 572. Municipal Law Firms
63. Personal Injury Law Firms 73. Civil Litigation Firms 563. Patent Law Firms 573. Education Law Firms
64. Family Law Firms 74. Workers' Comp Law Firms 564. Trademark Law Firms 574. Entertainment Law Firms
65. Criminal Defense Law Firms 75. Disability Law Firms 565. Construction Law Firms 575. Cannabis Law Firms
66. Business Law Firms 76. Elder Law Firms 566. Insurance Defense Firms 576. Aviation Law Firms
67. Employment Law Firms 77. Environmental Law Firms 567. Insurance Claims Law Firms 577. Maritime Law Firms
68. Immigration Law Firms 78. Healthcare Law Firms 568. Medical Malpractice Firms 578. Consumer Rights Law Firms
69. Real Estate Law Firms 79. Mediation Firms 569. Product Liability Law Firms 579. Probate Law Firms
70. Bankruptcy Law Firms 80. Court Reporting Services 570. Class Action Law Firms 580. Legal Document Services
Accounting, Advisory & Consulting 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
81. CPA Firms 91. Wealth Management Firms 581. Cost Accounting Firms 591. Sustainability Consultants
82. Bookkeeping Services 92. Retirement Plan Admins 582. Outsourced Accounting Firms 592. Healthcare Consulting Firms
83. Tax Preparation Firms 93. Actuarial Consulting Firms 583. Controller Service Firms 593. Technology Consulting Firms
84. Payroll Services 94. M&A Advisory Firms 584. Fractional COO Firms 594. Sales Consulting Firms
85. Fractional CFO Firms 95. Management Consulting Firms 585. Fractional CHRO Firms 595. Marketing Consulting Firms
86. Business Valuation Firms 96. Strategy Consulting Firms 586. Fractional CMO Firms 596. Pricing Consulting Firms
87. Forensic Accounting Firms 97. Operations Consulting Firms 587. Turnaround Consulting Firms 597. Supply Chain Consultants
88. Audit and Assurance Firms 98. Procurement Consulting Firms 588. Restructuring Advisors 598. Quality Management Firms
89. Financial Planning Firms 99. Risk Consulting Firms 589. Compliance Consulting Firms 599. Grant Consulting Firms
90. Investment Advisory Firms 100. Economic Consulting Firms 590. Governance Consulting Firms 600. Expert Witness Firms
Banking, Lending & Insurance 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
101. Community Banks 111. Private Equity Firms 601. National Banks 611. Bridge Loan Lenders
102. Credit Unions 112. Insurance Agencies 602. Regional Banks 612. Microfinance Lenders
103. Mortgage Lenders 113. Independent Insurance Firms 603. Online Banks 613. Payment Processing Firms
104. Mortgage Brokerage Firms 114. Employee Benefits Brokerages 604. Savings Banks 614. Fintech Lending Companies
105. Commercial Finance Companies 115. Property & Casualty Insurers 605. Farm Credit Lenders 615. Reinsurance Companies
106. Equipment Financing Companies 116. Life Insurance Companies 606. Auto Finance Companies 616. Captive Insurance Firms
107. Invoice Factoring Companies 117. Health Insurance Companies 607. Consumer Lending Firms 617. Managing General Agencies
108. Merchant Advance Firms 118. Title Insurance Agencies 608. Student Loan Servicers 618. Pet Insurance Companies
109. Private Credit Firms 119. Surety Bond Agencies 609. Debt Consolidation Firms 619. Bail Bond Agencies
110. Venture Capital Firms 120. Claims Adjusting Firms 610. Hard Money Lenders 620. Public Adjusting Firms
Real Estate & Property Operations 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
121. Residential Brokerages 131. Home Inspection Companies 621. Farm Brokerages 631. Senior Housing Operators
122. Commercial Brokerages 132. Land Surveying Firms 622. Land Brokerages 632. Affordable Housing Firms
123. Property Management Companies 133. Title and Escrow Companies 623. Luxury Home Brokerages 633. Build-to-Rent Operators
124. Apartment Managers 134. Real Estate Investment Firms 624. Tenant Representation Firms 634. Industrial Park Operators
125. HOA Management Firms 135. Self-Storage Facilities 625. Site Selection Firms 635. Office Park Operators
126. Real Estate Developers 136. Coworking Space Operators 626. Real Estate Auction Firms 636. Shopping Center Operators
127. Home Builders 137. Mobile Home Park Operators 627. Foreclosure Auction Firms 637. Data Center Developers
128. Custom Home Builders 138. Commercial Property Managers 628. Property Tax Consultants 638. Land Development Firms
129. Manufactured Home Dealers 139. Student Housing Operators 629. Leasing Companies 639. Timeshare Operators
130. Real Estate Appraisal Firms 140. Vacation Rental Managers 630. Corporate Housing Providers 640. Real Estate Syndicators
Architecture, Engineering & Construction 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
141. Architecture Firms 151. Home Remodeling Firms 641. Landscape Architecture Firms 651. Marine Engineering Firms
142. Interior Architecture Firms 152. Roofing Contractors 642. Urban Planning Firms 652. Design-Build Contractors
143. Civil Engineering Firms 153. Concrete Contractors 643. Survey Engineering Firms 653. Construction Managers
144. Structural Engineering Firms 154. Masonry Contractors 644. Transportation Engineers 654. Excavation Contractors
145. Mechanical Engineering Firms 155. Framing Contractors 645. Water Resources Engineers 655. Paving Contractors
146. Electrical Engineering Firms 156. Drywall Contractors 646. Fire Protection Engineers 656. Steel Erection Contractors
147. Geotechnical Engineers 157. Flooring Contractors 647. Acoustical Engineering Firms 657. Millwork Contractors
148. Environmental Engineers 158. Painting Contractors 648. Forensic Engineering Firms 658. Scaffolding Contractors
149. General Contractors 159. Glass and Glazing Contractors 649. Energy Engineering Firms 659. Waterproofing Contractors
150. Commercial Builders 160. Demolition Contractors 650. Mining Engineering Firms 660. Site Work Contractors
Home & Building Services 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
161. Plumbing Companies 171. Tree Service Companies 661. Appliance Repair Services 671. Sprinkler Repair Services
162. HVAC Contractors 172. Pool Service Companies 662. Handyman Services 672. Home Automation Firms
163. Electrical Contractors 173. Swimming Pool Builders 663. Gutter Installation Firms 673. Home Theater Installers
164. Solar Installation Companies 174. Septic Service Companies 664. Chimney Service Companies 674. Carpet Cleaning Companies
165. Insulation Contractors 175. Water Damage Restorers 665. Foundation Repair Firms 675. Upholstery Cleaning Firms
166. Garage Door Companies 176. Fire Damage Restorers 666. Basement Waterproofers 676. Air Duct Cleaning Firms
167. Locksmith Companies 177. Mold Remediation Companies 667. Siding Contractors 677. Junk Removal Companies
168. Pest Control Companies 178. House Cleaning Companies 668. Fence Contractors 678. Home Organizing Services
169. Lawn Care Companies 179. Window Cleaning Companies 669. Deck Building Companies 679. Holiday Lighting Firms
170. Landscaping Companies 180. Pressure Washing Companies 670. Irrigation Contractors 680. Mobile Home Repair Firms
Automotive Sales, Repair & Mobility 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
181. New Car Dealerships 191. Auto Glass Shops 681. Electric Vehicle Dealers 691. Dent Repair Shops
182. Used Car Dealerships 192. Car Audio Shops 682. Exotic Car Dealerships 692. Wheel Repair Shops
183. Motorcycle Dealerships 193. Auto Detailing Businesses 683. Classic Car Dealerships 693. Muffler Shops
184. RV Dealerships 194. Car Washes 684. Boat Dealerships 694. Radiator Repair Shops
185. Auto Repair Shops 195. Towing Companies 685. ATV Dealerships 695. Auto Upholstery Shops
186. Collision Repair Centers 196. Vehicle Wrap Shops 686. Golf Cart Dealerships 696. Car Alarm Installers
187. Tire Shops 197. Automotive Parts Stores 687. Auto Body Shops 697. Automotive Tint Shops
188. Oil Change Centers 198. Fleet Maintenance Companies 688. Diesel Repair Shops 698. Vehicle Inspection Stations
189. Transmission Repair Shops 199. Limousine Services 689. European Auto Shops 699. Emissions Testing Centers
190. Brake Repair Shops 200. Rideshare Fleet Operators 690. Mobile Mechanic Services 700. Motorcycle Repair Shops
Transportation, Logistics & Warehousing 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
201. Trucking Companies 211. Air Cargo Companies 701. Rail Freight Companies 711. Medical Courier Services
202. Freight Brokerages 212. Ocean Freight Forwarders 702. Drayage Companies 712. Postal Presort Companies
203. Third-Party Logistics 213. Customs Brokerage Firms 703. Tanker Trucking Firms 713. Container Storage Yards
204. Warehousing Companies 214. Intermodal Carriers 704. Flatbed Trucking Firms 714. Cross-Dock Facilities
205. Fulfillment Centers 215. Bus Charter Companies 705. Refrigerated Carriers 715. Bonded Warehouses
206. Courier Services 216. School Bus Contractors 706. Heavy Haul Carriers 716. Distribution Centers
207. Last-Mile Delivery Companies 217. Medical Transport Providers 707. Auto Transport Companies 717. Port Terminal Operators
208. Moving Companies 218. Car Rental Companies 708. Furniture Delivery Firms 718. Airport Shuttle Services
209. Commercial Storage Companies 219. Private Air Charter Firms 709. White Glove Delivery Firms 719. Taxi Companies
210. Cold Storage Facilities 220. Parking Management Companies 710. Bicycle Courier Services 720. Valet Parking Companies
General & Specialty Retail 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
221. Grocery Stores 231. Sporting Goods Stores 721. Department Stores 731. Lighting Stores
222. Convenience Stores 232. Outdoor Equipment Stores 722. Discount Stores 732. Plumbing Fixture Stores
223. Pharmacies 233. Pet Supply Stores 723. Dollar Stores 733. Flooring Stores
224. Hardware Stores 234. Florists 724. Warehouse Clubs 734. Garden Centers
225. Home Improvement Stores 235. Gift Shops 725. Liquor Stores 735. Bicycle Shops
226. Furniture Stores 236. Toy Stores 726. Health Food Stores 736. Musical Instrument Stores
227. Mattress Stores 237. Bookstores 727. Beauty Supply Stores 737. Thrift Stores
228. Appliance Stores 238. Jewelry Stores 728. Craft Supply Stores 738. Antique Stores
229. Electronics Stores 239. Clothing Boutiques 729. Fabric Stores 739. Pawn Shops
230. Office Supply Stores 240. Shoe Stores 730. Kitchen Supply Stores 740. Party Supply Stores
Food & Beverage 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
241. Full-Service Restaurants 251. Breweries 741. Fine Dining Restaurants 751. Tea Shops
242. Fast-Casual Restaurants 252. Wineries 742. Casual Dining Restaurants 752. Cocktail Bars
243. Quick-Service Restaurants 253. Distilleries 743. Pizza Restaurants 753. Sports Bars
244. Coffee Shops 254. Juice Bars 744. Seafood Restaurants 754. Nightclubs
245. Bakeries 255. Smoothie Shops 745. Steakhouse Restaurants 755. Food Halls
246. Dessert Shops 256. Meal Preparation Services 746. Breakfast Restaurants 756. Ghost Kitchens
247. Ice Cream Shops 257. Commercial Kitchens 747. Sandwich Shops 757. Corporate Cafeterias
248. Catering Companies 258. Packaged Food Brands 748. Delicatessens 758. Vending Machine Operators
249. Food Trucks 259. Specialty Food Stores 749. Donut Shops 759. Mobile Bar Services
250. Bars and Pubs 260. Butcher Shops 750. Candy Stores 760. Private Chef Services
Hospitality, Events & Travel 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
261. Hotels 271. Wedding Planning Companies 761. Boutique Hotels 771. Bus Tour Companies
262. Motels 272. Wedding Venues 762. Extended Stay Hotels 772. Walking Tour Companies
263. Resorts 273. Conference Centers 763. Hostels 773. Adventure Tour Companies
264. Bed-and-Breakfast Inns 274. Convention Centers 764. Glamping Resorts 774. Corporate Travel Agencies
265. Campgrounds 275. Event Rental Companies 765. Dude Ranches 775. Wedding Rental Firms
266. Recreational Vehicle Parks 276. Party Supply Rental Companies 766. Hunting Lodges 776. Tent Rental Companies
267. Travel Agencies 277. AV Event Producers 767. Ski Lodges 777. Photo Booth Companies
268. Tour Operators 278. Corporate Retreat Providers 768. Cruise Lines 778. Event Staffing Agencies
269. Destination Management Firms 279. Theme Parks 769. River Cruise Companies 779. Ticketing Companies
270. Event Planning Companies 280. Casinos 770. Charter Boat Operators 780. Vacation Club Operators
Education & Childcare 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
281. K–12 Private Schools 291. Career Colleges 781. Infant Care Centers 791. Massage Schools
282. Preschools 292. Tutoring Centers 782. After-School Programs 792. Flight Schools
283. Daycare Centers 293. Test Preparation Companies 783. Nanny Agencies 793. Maritime Schools
284. Montessori Schools 294. Language Schools 784. Au Pair Agencies 794. Nursing Schools
285. Religious Schools 295. Music Schools 785. Child Enrichment Centers 795. Allied Health Schools
286. Boarding Schools 296. Dance Schools 786. STEM Learning Centers 796. Real Estate Schools
287. Special Education Schools 297. Driving Schools 787. Coding Schools 797. Insurance Schools
288. Microschools 298. Corporate Training Companies 788. Art Schools 798. Business Schools
289. Trade Schools 299. Continuing Ed Providers 789. Culinary Schools 799. Executive Education Firms
290. Vocational Training Centers 300. Online Education Companies 790. Beauty Schools 800. College Prep Consultants
Software, Technology & IT Services 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
301. SaaS Companies 311. ERP Consultancies 801. DevOps Consulting Firms 811. Legaltech Companies
302. Mobile App Developers 312. CRM Consultancies 802. Software Testing Firms 812. Fintech Software Firms
303. Custom Software Firms 313. IT Staffing Firms 803. QA Automation Firms 813. E-commerce Platforms
304. Web Development Agencies 314. Computer Repair Shops 804. UX Design Agencies 814. Marketplace Platforms
305. Managed IT Service Providers 315. Data Recovery Services 805. Product Design Firms 815. API Management Companies
306. Cybersecurity Firms 316. Internet Service Providers 806. Blockchain Companies 816. Identity Security Firms
307. Cloud Consulting Firms 317. Telecommunications Companies 807. Robotics Software Firms 817. Network Security Firms
308. Data Analytics Companies 318. Data Centers 808. Healthtech Companies 818. Network Cabling Firms
309. AI Companies 319. Domain Registration Companies 809. Edtech Companies 819. Telecom Resellers
310. BI Consultancies 320. Web Hosting Companies 810. Proptech Companies 820. Database Consulting Firms
Marketing, Media & Creative Services 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
321. Digital Marketing Agencies 331. Graphic Design Studios 821. Direct Mail Agencies 831. Packaging Design Studios
322. Advertising Agencies 332. Video Production Companies 822. Experiential Agencies 832. Industrial Design Studios
323. Branding Agencies 333. Photography Studios 823. Media Buying Agencies 833. Illustration Studios
324. Public Relations Firms 334. Podcast Production Companies 824. Performance Marketing Firms 834. Copywriting Agencies
325. SEO Agencies 335. Publishing Companies 825. Conversion Rate Agencies 835. Motion Design Studios
326. Paid Media Agencies 336. Magazine Publishers 826. Affiliate Marketing Firms 836. Sound Design Studios
327. Social Media Agencies 337. Newspaper Publishers 827. Reputation Management Firms 837. Postproduction Companies
328. Content Marketing Agencies 338. Radio Stations 828. Political Consulting Firms 838. Casting Agencies
329. Email Marketing Agencies 339. Television Stations 829. Event Marketing Agencies 839. Modeling Agencies
330. Market Research Firms 340. Influencer Agencies 830. Shopper Marketing Agencies 840. Print Production Studios
Business Services, HR & Administration 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
341. Staffing Agencies 351. Translation Services 841. Recruitment Process Firms 851. Career Coaching Firms
342. Executive Search Firms 352. Interpretation Services 842. Temporary Staffing Firms 852. Resume Writing Services
343. Professional Employer Orgs 353. Document Shredding Companies 843. Healthcare Staffing Firms 853. Meeting Facilitation Firms
344. HR Consulting Firms 354. Records Management Companies 844. IT Recruiting Firms 854. Corporate Concierge Firms
345. Leadership Development Firms 355. Commercial Printing Companies 845. Sales Recruiting Firms 855. Mailroom Service Companies
346. Business Coaching Firms 356. Sign Companies 846. Diversity Consulting Firms 856. Notary Services
347. Franchise Consulting Firms 357. Background Check Firms 847. Compensation Consulting Firms 857. Process Serving Companies
348. Call Centers 358. Relocation Companies 848. Benefits Admin Firms 858. Licensing Service Firms
349. Answering Services 359. BPO Firms 849. Employee Survey Firms 859. Permit Expediting Firms
350. Virtual Assistant Agencies 360. Collection Agencies 850. Outplacement Services 860. Corporate Filing Services
Manufacturing & Fabrication 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
361. Machine Shops 371. Medical Device Manufacturers 861. Aerospace Manufacturers 871. Ceramic Manufacturers
362. Metal Fabrication Companies 372. Pharmaceutical Manufacturers 862. Auto Parts Manufacturers 872. Concrete Product Makers
363. Plastic Manufacturers 373. Cosmetics Manufacturers 863. Battery Manufacturers 873. Wood Product Manufacturers
364. Rubber Products Manufacturers 374. Chemical Manufacturers 864. Semiconductor Manufacturers 874. Mattress Manufacturers
365. Textile Mills 375. Paper Products Manufacturers 865. Sensor Manufacturers 875. Jewelry Manufacturers
366. Apparel Manufacturers 376. Packaging Manufacturers 866. Cable Manufacturers 876. Toy Manufacturers
367. Furniture Manufacturers 377. Building Material Makers 867. Lighting Manufacturers 877. Sporting Goods Makers
368. Cabinet Manufacturers 378. Food Processing Plants 868. Tool Manufacturers 878. Farm Equipment Makers
369. Electronics Manufacturers 379. Beverage Manufacturers 869. Fastener Manufacturers 879. Trailer Manufacturers
370. Electrical Manufacturers 380. Contract Manufacturers 870. Glass Manufacturers 880. Modular Building Makers
Wholesale, Distribution & Commercial Supply 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
381. Industrial Distributors 391. Foodservice Distributors 881. Grocery Wholesalers 891. Apparel Wholesalers
382. Electrical Distributors 392. Beverage Distributors 882. Seafood Wholesalers 892. Footwear Wholesalers
383. Plumbing Supply Distributors 393. Produce Distributors 883. Meat Wholesalers 893. Furniture Wholesalers
384. HVAC Supply Distributors 394. Automotive Parts Distributors 884. Dairy Distributors 894. Electronics Distributors
385. Building Material Dealers 395. Janitorial Distributors 885. Frozen Food Distributors 895. Computer Parts Distributors
386. Lumber Yards 396. Office Furniture Dealers 886. Bakery Supply Distributors 896. Chemical Distributors
387. Restaurant Suppliers 397. Packaging Supply Distributors 887. Coffee Distributors 897. Plastics Distributors
388. Medical Supply Distributors 398. Safety Equipment Distributors 888. Wine Distributors 898. Steel Distributors
389. Dental Supply Distributors 399. Lab Supply Distributors 889. Beer Distributors 899. Fastener Distributors
390. Pharmaceutical Wholesalers 400. Farm Supply Distributors 890. Beauty Supply Distributors 900. Irrigation Supply Dealers
Agriculture & Animal Services 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
401. Crop Farms 411. Vineyards 901. Wheat Farms 911. Horse Farms
402. Dairy Farms 412. Aquaculture Farms 902. Corn Farms 912. Sheep Farms
403. Cattle Ranches 413. Agricultural Cooperatives 903. Soybean Farms 913. Goat Farms
404. Poultry Farms 414. Farm Management Companies 904. Cotton Farms 914. Fish Hatcheries
405. Hog Farms 415. Veterinary Practices 905. Rice Farms 915. Feed Mills
406. Greenhouses 416. Emergency Vet Hospitals 906. Vegetable Farms 916. Grain Elevators
407. Plant Nurseries 417. Pet Grooming Businesses 907. Berry Farms 917. Farm Equipment Dealers
408. Sod Farms 418. Pet Boarding Facilities 908. Citrus Groves 918. Animal Feed Stores
409. Tree Farms 419. Dog Training Companies 909. Mushroom Farms 919. Mobile Veterinary Clinics
410. Orchards 420. Pet Sitting Services 910. Beekeeping Operations 920. Equine Veterinary Practices
Personal Care, Fitness & Wellness 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
421. Hair Salons 431. Boutique Fitness Studios 921. Blow Dry Bars 931. Cycling Studios
422. Barbershops 432. Yoga Studios 922. Eyebrow Studios 932. Boxing Gyms
423. Nail Salons 433. Pilates Studios 923. Eyelash Studios 933. Functional Fitness Gyms
424. Day Spas 434. Martial Arts Schools 924. Waxing Studios 934. Rowing Studios
425. Medical Spas 435. Personal Training Studios 925. Skin Care Clinics 935. Dance Fitness Studios
426. Massage Therapy Practices 436. Nutrition Counselors 926. Spray Tan Studios 936. Stretch Therapy Studios
427. Tanning Salons 437. Weight Management Clinics 927. Sauna Studios 937. Recovery Wellness Centers
428. Tattoo Studios 438. Wellness Coaching Practices 928. Meditation Centers 938. Health Coaching Practices
429. Piercing Studios 439. Float Therapy Centers 929. Breathwork Studios 939. Life Coaching Practices
430. Fitness Centers 440. Cryotherapy Centers 930. Barre Studios 940. Doula Services
Sports, Recreation & Leisure 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
441. Golf Courses 451. Miniature Golf Courses 941. Soccer Clubs 951. Laser Tag Centers
442. Country Clubs 452. Batting Cage Facilities 942. Baseball Clubs 952. Go-Kart Tracks
443. Tennis Clubs 453. Shooting Ranges 943. Basketball Clubs 953. Water Parks
444. Pickleball Facilities 454. Hunting & Fishing Guides 944. Volleyball Clubs 954. Amusement Parks
445. Bowling Centers 455. Marinas 945. Swim Clubs 955. Fishing Charters
446. Skating Rinks 456. Boat Rental Companies 946. Gymnastics Centers 956. Scuba Diving Centers
447. Trampoline Parks 457. Bicycle Rental Companies 947. Cheerleading Gyms 957. Surf Schools
448. Indoor Climbing Gyms 458. Ski Resorts 948. Fencing Clubs 958. Kayak Rental Companies
449. Escape Room Businesses 459. Summer Camps 949. Archery Ranges 959. Horseback Riding Centers
450. Arcades 460. Sports Tournament Operators 950. Paintball Parks 960. Recreational Leagues
Arts, Entertainment & Cultural Organizations 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
461. Movie Theaters 471. Game Development Studios 961. Opera Companies 971. Exhibition Producers
462. Live Music Venues 472. Museums 962. Symphony Orchestras 972. Festival Producers
463. Performing Arts Theaters 473. Art Galleries 963. Ballet Companies 973. Art Fair Operators
464. Concert Promoters 474. Auction Houses 964. Community Theaters 974. Craft Fair Operators
465. Talent Agencies 475. Performing Arts Companies 965. Dinner Theaters 975. Literary Agencies
466. Artist Management Companies 476. Dance Companies 966. Improv Theaters 976. Book Packagers
467. Recording Studios 477. Comedy Clubs 967. Puppet Theaters 977. Music Publishers
468. Music Production Companies 478. Children's Fun Centers 968. Magic Shows 978. Record Labels
469. Film Production Companies 479. Mobile DJ Companies 969. Circus Companies 979. Voiceover Studios
470. Animation Studios 480. Touring Entertainment Firms 970. Theme Entertainment Firms 980. Costume Rental Companies
Energy, Environment, Facilities & Security 40 organization types
Organization type Organization type Organization type Organization type
481. Electric Utility Companies 491. Environmental Consultants 981. Hydroelectric Operators 991. Composting Companies
482. Natural Gas Utility Companies 492. Commercial Cleaning Companies 982. Biomass Energy Companies 992. E-Waste Recycling Firms
483. Renewable Energy Developers 493. Janitorial Services 983. Geothermal Energy Firms 993. Scrap Metal Recyclers
484. Solar Energy Developers 494. Facilities Managers 984. Battery Storage Developers 994. Oil Recycling Companies
485. Wind Energy Developers 495. Security Guard Companies 985. EV Charging Operators 995. Asbestos Abatement Firms
486. Oil and Gas Producers 496. Alarm Installation Companies 986. Energy Efficiency Firms 996. Lead Abatement Firms
487. Propane Distributors 497. Fire Protection Companies 987. Energy Auditing Firms 997. Indoor Air Quality Firms
488. Waste Collection Companies 498. Elevator Service Companies 988. Utility Billing Services 998. Access Control Companies
489. Recycling Companies 499. Commercial Laundry Services 989. Water Utility Companies 999. Security Camera Installers
490. Hazardous Waste Firms 500. Uniform Rental Companies 990. Wastewater Utility Firms 1000. Fire Alarm Companies

TESTIMONIES

Why Business Leaders Love Working with Atlas

Priya Nair

Priya Nair

Thousand Oaks Family Dentistry

Madison, WI

The biggest relief is knowing someone is paying attention for us and turning it into simple next steps for our business.

Elena Martinez

Elena Martinez

Rock Springs Pediatric Therapy

Austin, TX

Atlas makes the confusing parts feel manageable. We can keep serving families while they keep our visibility moving forward.

Mia Reed

Mia Reed

Thames Landing

Portland, ME

We already had a good reputation. Atlas helped more people see it and made it easier for search to understand our story.

Rebecca Brooks

Rebecca Brooks

Cornerstone Law Group

Richmond, VA

We needed help that would not add more work to our week. Atlas keeps things moving without another tool for the team to manage.

Thomas Kim

Thomas Kim

Mitchell Heating

Colorado Springs, CO

The monthly reports are easy to follow. We can see what changed, what improved, and what Atlas is working on next.

James Carter

James Carter

Legacy Outdoor Living

Boise, ID

Atlas helps explain what we do in a way that feels true to us, instead of getting lumped in with every other company.

Anthony Silva

Anthony Silva

Rolands Roofing

San Antonio, TX

It feels like Atlas is keeping us current, instead of leaving us stuck with a website from five years ago.

Lauren Fisher

Lauren Fisher

Breakwater Accounting

Tampa, FL

We did not need another dashboard to check. Atlas handles the details and tells us what actually matters.

Natalie Chen

Natalie Chen

The Little Grand Market

Columbus, OH

The extra site gives people a clearer picture of who we are, what we do, and why customers choose us.

Michael Torres

Michael Torres

Revenue Growth Advisors

Denver, CO

The best part is that it keeps working after launch. It feels like an ongoing part of the business, not a one-time project.

Sofia Grant

Sofia Grant

Roots Wellness Center

Minneapolis, MN

Atlas helped us put our story, services, and proof in one place so more people can understand why we are a good fit.

Eric Johnson

Eric Johnson

Prestige Autoworks

Grand Rapids, MI

There is a lot happening behind the scenes, but the process feels simple. We know what is getting better without managing it ourselves.

PRICING

One Simple Price

One monthly plan with everything you need to become the favorite brand of AI Search.

MonthlyYearly-20%
Free for 90 Days • Cancel Anytime
$425/month$375/month

Pricing For Life

Billed Yearly • Pricing For Life

Your Atlas Visibility Engine Includes:

  • Personalized Knowledge Base
  • Dedicated Website for AI
  • Trust-Building Citations
  • AI-Compliant Content Creation
  • Primary Site AEO Agent
  • Guaranteed Lifetime Pricing
  • Free Competitor Tracking
  • No Hidden Usage Fees
  • Real Human Support
  • All Updates Included

Our Current Bonuses

Each Atlas client gets these added benefits at no added charge.

Monthly BrandRanker Report

Easily track how your AI visibility is improving each month.

$79 value

City-Wide Exclusivity

We honor your investment by not working with local competitors.

$199 value

Free AI Site Hosting

We gladly cover all hosting fees for your dedicated AI site.

$49 value

Protect your business from being erased by Google and ChatGPT.

The Atlas Visibility Engine was built for every local business that depends on customers finding them online.

Get Started →